Abstract
Purpose
The prenatal ultrasound visualization of the soft palate and especially the uvula may be technically difficult due to its anatomy and presence of surrounding structures. A cleft involving the soft palate and the uvula is one of the clinical features of Stickler syndrome, a rare connective tissue disorder.
Materials and methods
Third trimester scan performed at 30 weeks’ gestation in a pregnant woman with a familial history of Stickler syndrome using conventional 2D ultrasound.
Results
Transabdominal scan performed with the fetal head in oblique plane and following fetal swallowing movements enabled a previously unrecognized median cleft at the level of the uvula. Molecular biology analysis allowed a precise prenatal diagnosis of Stickler syndrome and excluded overlapping syndrome.
Conclusions
The prenatal ultrasound diagnosis was achieved time before the “equals signs” was proposed as a useful sonographic marker of a normal uvula. The identification of a bifid uvula by conventional 2D ultrasound led to a prenatal diagnosis of Stickler syndrome in this affected Family and allowed the neonatologist team to be available at the time of birth. Moreover, postnatal multispecialist follow up could be timely planned for targeted organ examination and appropriate management.
Introduction
The Stickler syndrome or hereditary progressive arthroophthalmopathy is a rare connective tissue disorder estimated to affect approximately 1/7,500 newborns [1]. The syndrome was first described by Stickler in 1965 [2] and phenotype includes degeneration of the vitreous gel and retina, myopia, craniofacial dysmorphisms, hearing impairment, skeletal dysplasia and progressive arthropathy. Mutations at three collagen loci COL2A1, COL11A1 and COL11A2 were found in Stickler syndrome patients [3, 4], with about two-thirds of investigated familial cases found to be associated to COL2A1 gene mutations [5]. An association between Stickler syndrome and Pierre-Robin sequence was reported [6, 7].
Cleft or bifid uvula, a small division or split in the midline of the uvula, is considered as a partial cleft palate (CP) of the smallest degree [8]. The prevalence of some form of uvular cleft was observed in 2.26 % of 709 children with the highest prevalence among Caucasian, in agreement with a previous incidence of 1.44 % on 9,701 adult Caucasians as reported by Meskin et al. [9].
Visualization of the soft palate was particularly problematic because of its curved anatomical arrangement, shadowing by neighboring tissues and difficulty in its discrete recognition on ultrasound examination due to lack of a landmark [10]. In a series by Cash et al. [11], 67 % of the cases were isolated cleft lip, 93 % were cleft lip and palate (CLP) while only 22 % were isolated CP.
The fact that the prenatal detection rate of CP is very low (0–1.4 %) demonstrates that the difficulty of visualizing CP during routine examination [11–16] and that there are no satisfactory indicators of an isolated CP [10]. The palate cannot be visualized in its entirety in a single conventional plane by 2D ultrasound as the soft palate lays at 30° to the primary. The secondary palate gradually increases in its curvature (in both sagittal and coronal planes) as the uvula lengthens with advancement of gestation. The uvula is a good landmark for directing the examination plane to the soft palate. The optimal time for visualization of the soft palate is beyond 20 weeks’ gestation, possibly at around 23–24 weeks, when the uvula could be identified consistently as a definitive structure and the palatal arch is present but not very marked. Nevertheless, as the soft palate can be seen also before 20 weeks’ gestation, especially in the sagittal plane, a sonographic search of this anatomical structure should be sought at the time of routine second trimester scan. 3D ultrasound has provided evidences to represents a new technical approach to the study of fetal palate and different techniques were developed [17–20]. However, actually 3D ultrasound is not systematically used during routine second trimester scan as it requires specific operators training and quality imaging is dependent upon acquisition of excellent volume data sets for offline analysis.
In a work by Wilhelm and Borgers [10], visualization of either the uvula or the soft palate was successful in 98.4 % of the cases using 2D ultrasound. A case of an isolated CP in a normal fetus was diagnosed while in one case with CLP, the CP and the completely split uvula were detected. Wilhelm and Borgers [10] concluded that absence of the “equals sign” indicates CP and should prompt further examination of the soft palate in a median sagittal section.
Case report
A 37-year-old woman, G5P4, was referred to our tertiary Prenatal Diagnostic Center at 30 weeks of gestation for detailed scan following an unremarkable second trimester scan performed elsewhere. The woman had a positive familial history of Stickler syndrome, as shown in the genealogical tree (Fig. 1).
The ultrasound examination was carried out in 2004 using a Technos MPX (Esaote, Genoa, Italy) equipped with a 3.5–5 MHz transabdominal probe. With the fetus lying in supine position, a normal hard and soft palate could be seen by means of 2D- and Doppler sonography. A scanning section of the fetal head in oblique plane allowed the operator to detect a previously undiagnosed median cleft at the level of the uvula (Fig. 2).
Amniocentesis was performed after genetic counseling and signed informed consent for fetal karyotyping and molecular biology analysis. Linkage polymorphism of the 3-prime-VNTR (variable-number tandem repeat) COL2A1 gene located on chromosome 12q13.11 was performed and showed normal 46, XY with mutation of the allele 3. No other congenital malformations could be demonstrated. Genetic and multispecialist counseling to the couple was undertaken and pediatric and neonatologist team were available at the time of delivery.
A baby weighing 3,760 g with normal 1- (9) and 5-min (10) Apgar score was born at term by normal vaginal delivery. The boy underwent serial follow up examination by a pediatric surgical team, with confirming of the prenatally 2D ultrasound diagnosis (Fig. 3).
Surgical correction of the bifid uvula was performed at 4 year postnatal life. The updated outcome comprises a mild to moderate deafness partially corrected by acoustic implants, a right blindness by the age of 6 following a severe retinal detachment and left eye cerclage due to vitreoretinopathy.
Discussion
Different geno- and phenotypes of Stickler syndrome were recognized and reported in Table 1. This connettive tissue disorder has a variable expression.
In our studied Family, the patient number 2 (female) of the third generation shows postnatally the following congenital anomalies: cleft of the soft palate, myopia, right retinal detachment, muscle-skeletal disorders, mild deafness, dental anomalies, and mitral valve prolapsed. The patient number 3 (female) of the third generation shows postnatal a cleft of the soft palate, myopia of high degree, hypotonia, psychomotor impairment, and complicated dental anomalies. The patient number 5 of the third generation (male) was studied prenatally with Level II sonographic examination that was initially performed elsewhere. The certificate referred to “a presumptive normal hard and soft palate” by means of 2D and Doppler ultrasound. When the patient was scanned at 30 weeks of gestation at our prenatal diagnostic tertiary care center, the favourable supine fetal position and the swallowing movements enabled the operator to detect, in an oblique coronal plane, a previous unrecognized bifid uvula.
In recent years, 3D ultrasound has provided evidences to represents a new technical approach to the study of fetal palate and different techniques were developed [17–20]. Nevertheless, 3D ultrasound is not systematically used during routine second trimester scan as it requires specific operators training and quality imaging is dependent upon acquisition of excellent volume data sets for offline analysis.
Nonetheless, when skill operators and ultrasound machine equipped with commercially software are available, 3D–4D ultrasound may aid the prenatal visualization and thus detection of CP, especially those involving the soft palate and the uvula. Of course, yawning and swallowing movements resulting in a fluid-filled pharynx physiologically improve the visualization of these structures [21].
Although this useful “visualization window” cannot be captured with only one volume, 3Dlive/4D may be applied.
Chosack and Eidelman [22] defined a cleft uvula as a distinct bifurcation of at least one-fourth of the total uvula length and reported prevalence of only 0.44 % among a population of 70.359 children ages 6–18 residing in Israel.
In a series of 667 singleton pregnant women referred for detailed anomaly scan between 20 and 25 weeks of gestation, Wilhelm and Borgers [10] were able to visualize the uvula during routine 2D ultrasound examination as an “equals sign” in 90.7 % and the soft palate in 85.3 %, respectively, in a median sagittal section. Visualization of either the uvula or the soft palate was successful in 98.4 % of the cases. A case of an isolated CP in a normal fetus was diagnosed while in one case with CLP, the CP and the completely split uvula were detected. These authors [10] concluded that absence of the “equals sign” indicates CP and should prompt further examination of the soft palate in a median sagittal section.
In our “historical” case diagnosed before the “equals sign” was proposed as a useful ultrasound landmark of the fetal uvula, the 2D ultrasound diagnostic cluster was a cleft involving medially and almost completely the uvula. The good snapshot of the bifid uvula was captured in an oblique plane and was aided by fetal swallowing movements.
Moreover, the ultrasound diagnosis of bifid uvula elicited a late amniocentesis with molecular biology analysis that could demonstrate a 3-prime-VNTR COL2A1 mutation on chromosome 12q13.11 enabling a prenatal diagnosis of Stickler syndrome.
The genetic investigation further revealed that the sibling had inherited the allele 3 from the mother that in this Family is responsible for the Stickler syndrome. The molecular biology investigation could also excluded overlapping autosomal dominant disorders involving mutation in the COL2A1 gene and including achondrogenesis type II, spondyloepimetaphyseal dysplasia Strudwick type, spondyloperipheral dysplasia, platyspondylic lethal skeletal dysplasia Torrence type, osteoarthritis with mild chondrodysplasia and rhegmatogeneous retinal detachment; autosomal disorders involving mutation in the COL11A1 such as Marshall syndrome or those involving COL11A2 mutation such as otospondylometaphyseal dysplasia, Weissenbach–Zwymuller syndrome and nonsyndromic sensorineural hearing loss (Table 2).
Furthermore, the prenatal diagnosis allowed appropriate genetic and multispecialist counseling with estimation of recurrence risk and made pediatric and neonatologist team assistance at the time of birth available. This is extremely importance in case of autosomal dominant type of Stickler syndrome as in our reported case because affected individuals have a 50 % chance of passing on the mutation to each offspring.
Beside maxillo-facial surgery, that in our case occurred at the age of four, affected individuals should undergo annual examination by a vitreoretinal specialist, audiologic evaluations every 6 months through age of 5 years, then annually thereafter, screening for mitral valve prolapse on routine examination.
References
Pacella E, Malvasi A, Tinelli A, Laterza F, Dell’ Edera D, Pacella F, Mazzeo F, Ferraresi A, Malarska KG, Cavallotti C (2010) Stickler syndrome in Pierre-Robin sequence prenatal ultrasonographic diagnosis and postnatal therapy: two cases report. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci 14:1051–1054
Stickler GB, Pugh DG (1967) Hereditary progressive arthroophthalmopathy. II. Additional observation on vertebral anomalies, a hearing defect and a report of a similar case. Mayo Clin Proc 42:495–500
Snead MP, Yates JW (1999) Clinical and molecular genetics of Stickler Syndrome. J Med Genet 36:353–359
Knowlton RG, Weaver EJ, Struyk AF, Knobloch WH, King RA, Norris K, Shamban A, Uitto J, Jimenez SA, Prockop DJ (1989) Genetic Linkage Analysis of Hereditary Arthro-Ophthalmopathy (Stickler Syndrome) and the Type 11 Procollagen Gene. Am J Hum Genet 45:681–688
Lisi V, Guala A, Lopez A, Vitali M, Spadoni E, Olivieri C, Danesino C, Mottes M (2002) Linkage analysis for prenatal diagnosis in a familial case of Stickler syndrome. Genet Couns 13:163–170
Weissenbacher G, Zweymuller E (1964) Coincidental occurrence of Pierre Robin and foetal chondrodysplasia. Monatsschr Kinderheilkd 112:315–317
Soulier M, Sigaudy S, Chau C, Philip N (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of Pierre–Robin sequence as part of Stickler syndrome. Prenat Diagn 22:567–568
Wharton P, Mowrer DE (1992) Prevalence of cleft uvula among school children in kindergarten through grade five. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 29:10–12
Meskin Lh, Gorlin RJ, Isaacson RJ (1963) Abnormal morphology of the soft palate: I. The prevalence of cleft uvula. Presented at the Meeting of the International Association for dental Research, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Wilhelm L, Borgers H (2010) The “equals sign”: a novel marker in the diagnosis of fetal isolated cleft palate. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 36:439–444
Cash C, Set P, Colemann N (2001) The accuracy of antenatal ultrasound in detection of facial clefts in a low risk screening population. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 18:432–436
Grandjean H, Larroque D, Levi S (1999) The performance of routine ultrasonographic screening of pregnancy in the Eurofetus Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:446–454
Clementi M, Tenconi R, Bianchi F, Stoll C, Euroscan study group (2000) Evaluation of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip with or without cleft palate by ultrasound: experience from 20 European registries. Prenat Diagn 20:870–875
Shaikh D, Mercer NS, Sohan K, Kyle P, Soothill P (2001) Prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate. Br J Plastic Surg 54:288–289
Offerdal K, Jebens N, Syvertsen T, Blaas HG, Johansen OJ, Eik-Nes SH (2008) Prenatal ultrasound detection of facial clefts: a prospective study of 49314 deliveries in a non-selected population in Norway. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 31:639–646
Gilham JC, Anand S, Bullen PJ (2009) Antenatal detection of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: incidence of associated chromosomal and structural anomalies. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:410–415
Campbell S, Lees C, Moscoso G, Hall P (2005) Ultrasound antenatal diagnosis of cleft palate by a new technique: the 3D “reverse face” view. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 25:12–18
Platt LD, Devore GR, Pretorius DH (2006) Improving cleft palate/cleft lip antenatal diagnosis by 3-dimensional sonography: the “flipped face” view. J Ultrasound Med 25:1423–1430
Pilu G, Segata M (2007) A novel technique for visualization of the normal and cleft fetal secondary palate: angled insonation and three-dimensional ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:166–169
Tonni G, Centini G, Rosignoli L (2005) Prenatal screening for fetal face and clefting in a prospective study on low-risk population: can 3- and 4-dimensional ultrasound enhance visualization and detection rate? Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 100:420–426
Tonni G, Grisolia G (2013) Navigating and lightening the soft palate using HDlive. Arch Gyn Obstet. doi:10.1007/s00404-013-2888-7
Chosack A, Eidelman E (1978) Cleft uvula: prevalence and genetics. Cleft Palate J 5:63–67
Conflict of interest
Mario Lituania and Gabriele Tonni declare that they do not have a financial relationship with any organization or company. They had full control of all primary data and agree to allow the Journal to review their data if requested.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lituania, M., Tonni, G. Bifid uvula and familial Stickler syndrome diagnosed prenatally before the sonographic “equals sign” landmark. Arch Gynecol Obstet 288, 483–487 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2920-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-013-2920-y