Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T13:23:47.444Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The parthenogenetic midge of water supply systems, Paratanytarsus grimmii (Schneider) (Diptera: Chironomidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 July 2009

P. H. Langton ,
P. S. Cranston  and
P. Armitage
P. H. Langton
Affiliation:
3, St Felix Road, Ramsey Forty Foot, Huntingdon, Cambs., PE 17 1YH, UK
P. S. Cranston
Affiliation:
ANIC, Division of Entomology, CSIRO, GPO Box 1700, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia and formerly Entomology Department, British Museum (Natural History), Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK
P. Armitage
Affiliation:
Freshwater Biological Association River Laboratory, East Stoke, nr Wareham, Dorset, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chironomid midges have been known to include parthenogenetic species for over a century. One of these species, Paratanytarsus grimmii (Schneider), cited under several different names here shown to be junior synonyms, has attained some notoriety as a pest. Its occurrence as a supposedly paedogenetic (actually pharate adult parthenogenetic) inhabitant of water distribution systems is discussed and related to its more usual occurrence in a variety of small water bodies including aquaria. New synonymy is proposed and a lectotype designated.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Bulletin of Entomological Research , Volume 78 , Issue 2 , June 1988 , pp. 317 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bause, E. (1913). Die Metamorphose der Gattung Tanytarsus und einiger verwandter Tendipedidenarten.—126 pp. Inaug. Diss. Zool. Inst. Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität zu Münster.Google Scholar
Edward, D. H. D. (1963). The biology of a parthenogentic species of Lundstroemia (Diptera:Chironomidae), with descriptions of the immature stages.—Proc. R. ent. Soc. Lond. (A) 38, 165–170.Google Scholar
Forsyth, D. J. (1971). Some New Zealand Chironomidae (Diptera).—J. R. Soc. N.Z. 1, 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, P. (1961). The Chironomidae (Diptera) of Australia.—Aust. J. Zool. 9, 611–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, B. (1973). The Tanytarsini (Diptera: Chironomidae) of Australia.—Aust. J. Zool., Suppl. Ser. no. 23, 403–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1934). Ceratopogonidae et Chironomidae nouveaux ou peu connus d'Europe (cinquième note).—Bull. Annls Soc. r. ent. Belg. 74, 287–294.Google Scholar
Goetghebuer, M. (1938). Tendipedidae-Tendipedinae [part].—Fliegen palaearkt. Reg. 13C, 73–128.Google Scholar
Grimm, O. von (1870). Die ungeschlechtiche Fortplanzung einer Chironomus-Art und deren Entwicklung aus dem unbefruchteten Ei.—Zap. imp. Akad. Nauk 7 (15), 1–24.Google Scholar
Grimm, O. von (1871). On the agamic reproduction of a species of Chironomus, and its development from the unfecundated egg.—Ann. Mag. nat. Hist. 8, 31–45, 106–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. (1905). Aquatic nematocerous Diptera. II.—pp. 76–327 in Needham, I. G., Morton, K. I. & Johannsen, O. A. (Eds). May flies and midges of New York.—Bull. N. Y. St. Mus. no. 86, 331 pp.Google Scholar
Johannsen, O. A. (1910). Paedogenesis in Tanytarsus.—Science, N.Y. (N.S.) 32, 768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johannsen, O.A. (1937). Aquatic Diptera. Part III. Chironomidae: subfamilies Tanypodinae, Diamesinae, and Orthocladiinae.—Mem. Cornell Univ. agric. Exp. Stn no. 205, 84 pp.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1909). Diagnoses de nouveaux Chironomides d'Allemagne.—Bull. Soc. Hist. nat. Metz 26, 37–56.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1917). Chironomides d'Amérique conservés au Musée National Hongrois de Budapest.—Annls hist.-nat. Mus. natn. hung. 15, 292–364.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1921 a). Synopse de la tribu des Chironomariae.—Annls Soc. scient. Brux. 40, 269–276.Google Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1921 b). Chironomides de l'Afrique Équatoriale (1re partie).—Annls Soc. ent. Fr. 90, 1–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, J. J. (1922). Chironomides nouveaux ou peu connus de la région paléarctique.—Annls Soc. scient. Brux. 42, 71–128.Google Scholar
Krüger, F. (1941). Parthenogenetische Stylotanytarsus Larven als Bewohner einer Trinkwasserleitung. (Tanytarsus-Studien III: die Gattung Stylotanytarsus).—Arch. Hydrobiol. 38, 214–253.Google Scholar
Langton, P. H. (1974). On the biology of the parthenogenetic Paratanytarsus breeding in the Essex Water Company distribution system.—Wat. Treat. & Exam. 23, 230–231.Google Scholar
Lindeberg, B. (1971). Parthenogenetic strains and unbalanced sex ratios in Tanytarsini (Diptera, Chironomidae).—Ann. zool. fenn. 8, 310–317.Google Scholar
Munsterhjelm, G. (1920). Om Chironomidernas äggläggning och äggrupper.—Acta Soc. Fauna Flora fenn. 47 (2), 1–174.Google Scholar
Nietzke, G. (1938). Die Kossau. Hydrologische-faunistische Untersuchungen an schleswig-holsteinischen Fliessgewässern.—Arch. Hydrobiol. 32, 1–74.Google Scholar
Palmén, E. (1960). Paratanytarsus-Arten (Dipt., Chironomidae) aus dem β-mesohalinen und oligohalinen Brackwasser des Finnischen Meerbusens.—Suom. hyönt. Aikak. 26, 280–291.Google Scholar
Pinder, L. C. V. & Reiss, F. (1983). The larvae of Chironominae (Diptera: Chironomidae) of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses.—Entomol. Scand. Suppl. no. 19, 293–435.Google Scholar
Pinder, L. C. V. & Reiss, F. (1986). The pupae of Chironominae (Diptera: Chironomidae) of the Holarctic region. Keys and diagnoses.—Entomol. Scand. Suppl. no. 28, 299–456.Google Scholar
Reiss, F. (1972). Die Tanytarsini (Chironomidae, Diptera) Südchiles und Westpatagoniens. Mit Hinweisen auf die Tanytarsini-Fauna der Neotropis.—Stud. neotrop. Fauna 7, 49–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiss, F. & Säwedal, L. (1981). Keys to males and pupae of the Palaearctic (excl. Japan) Paratanytarsus Thienemann & Bause, 1913, n. comb., with descriptions of three new species (Diptera, Chironomidae).—Entomol. Scand. Suppl. no. 15, 73–104.Google Scholar
Saether, O. A. (1977). Female genitalia in Chironomidae and other Nematocera: morphology, phylogenies, keys.—Bull. Fish. Res. Bd Can. 197, 209 pp.Google Scholar
Sasa, M. (1979). A morphological study of adults and immature stages of 20 Japanese species of the family Chironomidae (Diptera).—Res. Rep. Natn. Inst. Env. Stud. no. 7, 1–149.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1885). Chironomus Grimmii und seine Parthenogenesis.—Zool. Beitr. 1, 301–302.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1929). Chironomiden-Metamorphosen. II. Die Sectio Tanytarsus genuinus.—Arch. Hydrobiol. Planktonk. 20, 93–123.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1935). Chironomiden-Metamorphosen. XII.—Dt. ent. Z. 2, 86–96.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1950). Lunzer Chironomiden. Ergebnisse von Untersuchungen der stehenden Gewässer des Lunzer Seengebietes (Niederösterreich).—Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. no. 18, 1–202.Google Scholar
Thienemann, A. (1951). Tanytarsus-Studien II. Die Subsectio Paratanytarsus. Auf Grund der nachgelassenen Papiere Friedreich Wilh. Carl Krüger's.—Arch. Hydrobiol. Suppl. no. 18, 595–632.Google Scholar
Williams, D. N. (1974). An infestation by a parthenogenetic chironomid.—Wat. Treat. & Exam. 23, 215–229.Google Scholar
Zavřel, J. (1907). Paedogenese a parthenogenese u Tanytarsa.—Čas. české Spol. ent. 4, 64–65.Google Scholar